Elmstead Parish Council Development Survey Jan 13
Elmstead Market Parish Council Survey on Proposed Developments - Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Respondents: |
|
94 |
residential addresses |
6 |
business addresses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
Given that TDC intend to permit the building of 40 new dwellings, would you: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
residential |
total (inc Business) |
|
|
|
|
a) Want no development |
|
17 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
b) Accept less than 40 dwellings |
14 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
c) Accept 40 dwellings |
|
47 |
53 |
|
|
|
|
No answer |
|
15 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
Unclear |
|
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
94 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Please state which development(s) you think would be most appropriate for the village, alon with the improvements you |
|
consider to be the most important. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Preferred Sites (residential only) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
site 1 Church Rd |
site 2 Meadow Cl |
site 3 School Rd |
site 4 Bromley Road |
site 5 Grove Farm |
site 6 Bottles Hall |
None |
Total |
Pref 1 |
37 |
14 |
31 |
1 |
2 |
|
9 |
94 |
Pref 2 |
13 |
20 |
9 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
45 |
94 |
Pref 3 |
11 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
|
61 |
94 |
Pref 4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
92 |
94 |
Pref 5 |
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
92 |
94 |
Pref 6 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
92 |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Preferred Sites (total (inc Business)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
site 1 Church Rd |
site 2 Meadow Cl |
site 3 School Rd |
site 4 Bromley Rd |
site 5 Grove Farm |
site 6 Bottles Hall |
None |
Total |
Pref 1 |
43 |
14 |
31 |
1 |
2 |
|
9 |
100 |
Pref 2 |
13 |
20 |
9 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
51 |
100 |
Pref 3 |
11 |
12 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
|
67 |
100 |
Pref 4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
1 |
98 |
100 |
Pref 5 |
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
98 |
100 |
Pref 6 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
98 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b) Improvements Wanted |
|
See appendix 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c) None of the above |
|
See appendix 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
What improvements would the village most benefit from? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
residential |
total (inc Business) |
|
|
|
|
a) Affordable housing for local residents |
41 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
b) Community Centre |
|
48 |
53 |
|
|
|
|
c) Road Crossing |
|
60 |
64 |
|
|
|
|
d) Playing Field/Football Pitch |
34 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
e) Changing Rooms for sports |
20 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
g) More Parking |
|
24 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
h) Allotments |
|
38 |
44 |
|
|
|
|
i) Other |
|
See appendix 2 |
See appendix 2 |
|
|
|
|
None |
|
|
11 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
As Tending District Council intend to give permission for 40 dwellings to be built in Elmstead over the next 10 years, would you |
|
prefer this to consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
residential |
total (inc Business) |
|
|
|
|
a) One development of 40 |
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
b) Two developments of 20 |
36 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
c) 3+ smaller developments |
15 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
No answer |
|
9 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
Unclear |
|
2 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
94 |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
If Site 2 (TDC preferred site) is permitted to be developed, what could be done to improve the impact of this development? |
|
Changes beneficial to other sites: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Appendix 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Additional Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Appendix 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|